
Oct 14, 2016
When people complain to me that it is so difficult to “get rid of” poor performing people, I often think that it is like saying that you can’t understand why the poor performing horse keeps getting to take part in the race. We allow it, and we enable it when we make poor hiring decisions.
We pay so much attention to improving our technology, as we should. We pay so much attention to improving our work standards and services, as we should. But what about our interviewing processes? We should be paying just as much attention to this as well.
Besides trying to get rid of the artful dodger, time is wasted having to manage them more closely. They seldom work independently to the standard required, and their colleagues generally carry a greater burden creating unhappiness. The artful dodger is someone with whom we are very familiar. They communicate very eloquently, usually have great personalities, and are able to blur the line between what they are individually capable of or responsible for, behind the efforts of their team.
To counter this very capable interviewee, there are three requirements that I would deem essential:
- A well-developed set of interview questions that have been discussed and analysed in terms of what the job requirements are;
- Effective training in how to conduct interviews and the interview process as a whole; and
- A doggedness and determination to make sure that questions are answered which reveal the individual’s personal abilities and responsibilities, preferably with concrete examples.
A skilled interviewer would certainly follow up with “I’m glad that attention to detail is important to you and your team. Could you tell me how you, personally, check the details? Can you give me some examples?” This then also allows the interviewer to follow up with another question around attention to detail, which enables them to recount an event where perhaps they missed something important, and what the consequences were.
In short, recognising the artful dodger is a skill and if we can avoid employing people who are not what they claim to be, we can minimise the instances of finding ourselves in situations where we later need to “get rid of” them.
For more information, take a look at New Horizons' Management and Leadership courses.How do your Excel skills stack up?
Test NowNext up:
- Data Recovery in Windows Server 2016
- Life has many, many stations. Having trouble getting to your next one?
- Updates to Angular 2 that makes coding easier – Custom Pipes
- Do a quick forecast in Excel 2016
- Outlook on the Web in Exchange Server 2016
- Does good design sell itself?
- I'll have courtesy with my gelato, thanks.
- 6 conversations a new manager should have
- Updates to Angular 2 that makes coding easier – HTTP Client
- Define and solve a problem by using Excel Solver
Previously
- Data Recovery in Windows Server 2016
- Remove all hyperlinks from an Excel sheet using VBA
- Your essential guide to performance feedback
- PRINCE2® Agile – Enhancing your project delivery
- Working with Styles – Part 5
- Microsoft Project 2013 & 2016: Levelling Gantt
- Make multiple copies of a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet in seconds
- What Sort of Leader are You?
- Beguile for a while with a smile
- Exchange Server 2016 features and updates – Part 2